The Tribunal adjourned the appeals to allow the Respondent Bank to submit details regarding payments made, breakup of payable amounts including legal expenses, and verification of interest due to the auction purchaser.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 57/2017
Between M/s. Super India, … Appellant/s a Proprietary Concern of Mr. A. Shivan & Anr. V/s.
State Bank of India …Respondent/s
AND
Appeal No. 58/2017
Between M/s. Super Tyre Remoulding Work, … Appellant/s a Proprietary Concern of Mr A. Shivan & Anr. V/s.
State Bank of India …Respondent/s
Mr Manmohan Rao, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr P. Kumar Jain, i/b M/s. Prakash Panjabi & Co, Advocate for Respondent Bank.
Mr H. T. Ameta, Advocate for Intervener, the Central Excise Department (G.S.T.).
Ms Vaishali Bhilare, Advocate for Auction Purchaser.
-: Common Order dated 25/10/2022:-
The Respondent is granted time to go through the details of the payment made by the Appellant, and if it is possible, they may also give a breakup of the amount payable including the legal expenses claimed.
The interest on the amount that is due to the auction purchaser may be also verified.
Post on 14.11.2022 for compliance/hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-05
1
M/s. Super India
State Bank of India
Mr A. Shivan
Mr. Justice Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
