In an appeal hearing where the appellant bank failed to appear, the Chairperson dismissed the appeal for default due to inaction regarding statutory substituti
Appeal dismissed for default; Miscellaneous Applications dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
M.A. No. 67/2012 (Stay)
In
Appeal No. 57/2009
Between
Oriental Bank of Commerce … Appellant/s V/s.
M/s. Jagyasu Enterprises P. Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s Ms Vrushali Agarwal, i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co., Advocate for Respondent.
None appears for the Appellant. The specific direction given to the Appellant to carry out the substitution of the Appellant Bank which has merged with Punjab National Bank is still not carried out.
Since the Appellant has not appeared and steps have not been taken for amendment.
I assume that the Appellant is not keen on prosecuting the Appeal.
Hence, the Appeal is dismissed for default.
All Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-33
1
Oriental Bank of Commerce
M/s. Jagyasu Enterprises P. Ltd. & Ors.
Ms Vrushali Agarwal
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
