The Appellate Tribunal refused to grant an adjournment to the respondent bank in appeal no. 56/2009, directing parties to be ready for hearing on 21.06.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 56/2009
Between Pravin Dodiya & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s. Bank of Baroda …Respondent/s
Ms. Sanjana Ghogare, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. Mobin Sayed i/b M/s M. V. Kini & Co., Advocate for Respondent Bank.
-: Order dated : 19/04/2022 :-
The matter is ripe for hearing. Ld. Counsel appearing for Appellants is ready for hearing, but the Ld. Counsel appearing for Respondent Bank seeks adjournment.
Being a matter of 2009, parties are directed to get ready positively for hearing on the next date. No further adjournment will be granted.
Post on 21.06.2022 for hearing.
dpj/mks-20
1
Pravin Dodiya & Anr.
Bank of Baroda
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
