Hdfc Bank v. Smt Dipali Baidya
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
( Appeal No. 54 of 2021) (Arising out of S. A. No. 26 of 2019 in DRT-3, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
12.08.2022 A.O. HDFC Bank Ltd. … Appellant -VsSmt. Depali Baidya ….Respondent Mr. Shamik Basu, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. K.C. Das, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Respondent prays for granting three week’s time for filing opposition with advance copy to the Appellant who may file rejoinder within a week thereafter. List on 23rd September, 2022 for hearing of Appeal. The name of Mr. K. C. Das, Learned Counsel be printed on the cause list as Counsel for the Respondent.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 12th August, 2022 3/tp
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A.O. HDFC Bank Ltd.
- respondent
Smt. Depali Baidya
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court