Mansi Shankar v. Arms (a division of Arcil)
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi, ordered the appellant to engage counsel Mr. Sanjeev Kakra for further hearings on a fixed date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 521/2018 Arising out of S.A. No. 496/2010 (DRT-III, Delhi)
Mansi Shankar Vs ARMS (a Division of Arcil)
09.05.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Ms. Mansi Shankar, appellant in person
Ms. Nidhi Mehra, proxy counsel for Ms. Usha Singh, Ld. Counsel for respondent
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Ms. Mansi Shankar, appellant appearing in person submits that she needs a counsel as she is not in a position to engage a counsel on her own. Mr. Sanjeev Kakra, Ld. Senior Advocate who is present in connection with some other case states that he is ready to help her out. Appellant may contact Mr.Sanjeev Kakra, Ld. Senior Advocate.
List the matter on 12.05.2022, the date already fixed, for further proceedings.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Mansi Shankar
ARMS (a Division of Arcil)
Usha Singh
Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court