This order records the appellant's counsel was heard via video conferencing. The Chairperson dated the matter for further listing regarding a registry objection to deficient court fee costs and recorded no substantive disposal of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 50/2022 Arising out of T.S.A. No. 40/2021 (DRT, Jaipur)
M/s Mohan Ram Trading Pvt. Ltd. Vs
M/s Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Ltd. & Ors.
27.05.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Ravi Data, Ld. Counsel for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari along with Mr. Sushant Bali, Ld. Counsel for the respondent no.1
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
As per the registry, the Court Fee is deficient.
List the matter before the Ld. Registrar on 31.05.2022 for removal of the objection regarding court fee.
-ap
(CHAIRPERSON)
M/s Mohan Ram Trading Pvt. Ltd.
M/s Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Ltd.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
23 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
