The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal for want of compliance with the pre-deposit condition, leaving the appellant liberty to revive it after making the requisite deposit.
The appeal was dismissed for want of compliance of the condition of pre-deposit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.490/2019 In
Misc. Application No.153/2018 Arising out of S.A.No.797/2017 (DRT-II, Chandigarh)
Sh.Lekh Raj & Another Vs Oriental Bank of Commerce
24.11.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present : None for appellant.
Mr. Prashant Kumar, Ld. Counsel for respondent bank.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video conferencing.
None has appeared on behalf of appellant. On perusal of records it is observed that pre-deposit has not been made by the appellant till date.
In view of the above, the present appeal cannot be entertained and the same is dismissed for want of compliance of the condition of pre-deposit. The appellant is, however, given liberty to revive the appeal by filing appropriate application after making the requisite pre-deposit.
File be consigned to record.
( CHAIRPERSON )
N
Sh. Lekh Raj & Another
Oriental Bank of Commerce
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
