Ms Bano Marble Industries Rajsamand v. Bank Of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
A single-paragraph order recording the proceedings via video conference, issuing interim procedural directions regarding service of documents and time limits for filing reply and rejoinder, and listing the matter for hearing on a specified date.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.489/2019
Arising out of S.A.No.49/2018(DRT, Jaipur)
M/s Bano Marble Industries Rajsamand Vs
Bank of Baroda
06.05.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Dr. Ram Avtar Sharma, Ld. counsel for the appellant.
Mr. R.P.Agarwal, Ld. counsel for the respondent no. 1.
Mr. Ajay Kumar Talesara, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.2
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Ld. Counsel for respondent no.2 states that he has not received copy of appeal. Let copy of the appeal paper book be supplied him today itself through email by appellant. Let reply be filed within four weeks from today and rejoinder, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Bano Marble Industries Rajsamand
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
Brijesh Sethi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court