The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal directed the counsel for the appellants to clear defects raised by the office regarding an application for impleading and substitution, ordering a hearing post CLC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 475/2006
Between
Govindbhai Chhababhai Patel & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s.
Ganpati Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s
Ms Sonali Jain, Advocate for the Appellants.
Mr. Rupak Sawangikar, i/b M/s. V. Deshpande & Co., Advocate for Respondent No. 4.
Mr Nilesh Bamne, i/b M/s. A.R. Bamne, Advocate for the Respondent No. 5.
-: Order dated: 08/09/2022:-
There is an application for impleading and substitution lying in defects raised by the office.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant is directed to clear the defects pointed out by the office and thereafter, the application shall be posted for consideration.
Post on 22.09.202 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-11
1
Govindbhai Chhababhai Patel & Ors.
Ganpati Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd. & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
