Assets Reconstuction Company India Ltd. v. Mrs Sudha Satish Mahendre
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal called the absent respondent's counsel. The matter was set for an ex-parte hearing on 01.08.2022 due to the respondent's non-appearance.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 42/2014
Between
Assets Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. Mrs. Sudha Satish Mahendre & Anr. …Respondent/s Mr. R.L. Motwani, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated : 15/06/2022 :-
There is no representation for the Respondents.
The Counsel who had filed Vakalatnama for Respondents has not been appearing for last many hearings. On 30.03.2022 when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was specific direction to the parties to get ready for hearing, positively.
Today, the Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant is ready for hearing but Respondent is not present. Hence, Respondent is called absent and set ex-parte.
Post the matter for ex-parte hearing on 01.08.2022.
Sd/-
Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Assets Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd.
- respondent
Mrs. Sudha Satish Mahendre & Anr.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court