The Tribunal corrected the record regarding counsel appearing for Respondent No. 2 in the connected appeal and posted the matter for future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 42/2013
Between
Bank of Baroda … Appellant/s
V/s. M/s. Albert Granites Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s
Ms Mittal Parikh, i/b M/s. M. V. Kini & Co., Advocate for Appellant. Mr Harjot Singh, i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co. Advocate for Respondent No. 2 in Appeal No. 28/2013
-: Order dated: 08/12/2022:-
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of praecipe dated 06.12.2022 filed by Respondent No. 2 in Appeal No. 28/2013 seeking urgent relief.
The matter is coming up on the request made for speaking to the minutes. It is noticed that there was a mistake with regard to the counsel appearing for Respondent No. 2 in Appeal No. 42 /2013. In fact, the counsel appearing for Respondent No. 2 is appearing in the connected Appeal No. 28/2013 and not in this Appeal and therefore, the necessary correction striking out the appearance of the counsel for Respondent No. 2 shall be deleted.
Post on 05.01.2023 for hearing.
mks-11
1
Bank of Baroda
M/s. Albert Granites Pvt. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
