The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal listed the appeal for further proceedings on 04.11.2022, noting that the appellant failed to place the impugned order on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.394/2019
Arising out of Diary No.1005236/2017(DRT-I, Delhi)
Madhu Bahl & Ors.
Vs
Bank of Maharashtra
27.07.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Ravi Data, Ld. counsel for the appellants
Mr. Akash Jain proxy for Mr.S.B. Singh, Ld. counsel for respondent bank
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Ld. counsel for the appellant has not placed on record the order passed by the learned Presiding Officer of DRT. Let him place the same on record.
List for 04.11.2022 for further proceedings.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Madhu Bahl & Ors.
Bank of Maharashtra
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
