The tribunal listed the appeal and a miscellaneous application for a later date. The respondent counsel indicated a lack of engagement and a deadline for filing the vakalatnama. No substantive admission or decision was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 391/2019 Misc. Application No. 483/2019 Arising out of S.A. No. 275/2017 (DRT-III, Chandigarh)
Ashok Kumar Sood & Ors. Vs Bank of Baroda & Ors.
05.05.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Ms. Bindu Das, Ld. counsel for the appellant.
Mr. Rakesh Chaudhary, Ld. counsel for the Respondent Bank.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Mr. Rakesh Chaudhary, Ld. counsel appearing for the respondent bank submits that he has been recently engaged and will file his vakalatnama before next date. Let him do so within seven days from today.
List on 06.02.2023 for hearing on application for condonation of delay and in appeal. In case of urgency, the parties are at liberty to approach this Tribunal for early hearing.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-Amit
Ashok Kumar Sood & Ors.
Bank of Baroda & Ors.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
