The Delhi Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an appeal arising from a DRT order, as the appellant failed to make the mandatory 25% pre-deposit and appeared unrepresented.
The appeal is dismissed as not entertainable for want of compliance of the condition pre-deposit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.39/2021 Arising out of S.A.No.10/2021(DRT, Jaipur)
Shri Kailash Agarwal Vs State Bank of India & Ors.
26.05.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: None
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing. None has appeared for the appellant. The appellant has also not made the pre-deposit of minimum 25% as directed by this Tribunal 13.10.2021. Even affidavit of service has not been filed. In these circumstances, the appeal is dismissed as not entertainable for want of compliance of the condition pre-deposit.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Kailash Agarwal
State Bank of India
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
