Mr Ross Deas & Anr. v. Central Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Order recording an application for adjournment by the respondent bank due to the late filing of the vakalatnama. Hearing was postponed to a future date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Appeal No.37/2008
Between
Mr Ross Deas & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s. Central Bank of India …Respondent/s
Mr Vinay Deshpande, i/b M/s. V Deshpande & Co., Advocate for Appellant
Mr Shweta Jha, i/b Mr R.K. Jha, Advocate for Respondent Bank.
-: Order dated: 26/08/2022:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent Bank seeks adjournment stating that the vakalatnama is being filed today.
The parties shall get ready for a hearing on the next date, positively.
Post on 18.10.2022 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-27
1
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr Ross Deas & Anr.
- respondent
Central Bank of India
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court