Interim order on time limit for filing rejoinder in Debt Recovery Appeal; hearing adjourned to 06.04.2023 for final arguments.
Time granted to file rejoinder within two weeks; matter listed on 06.04.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.364/2019 Arising out of S.A.No182/2018(DRT, Jaipur)
Smt. Girija Sharma Vs
Bank of Baroda
24.11.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present : Mr. Anand Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for appellant.
Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for respondent bank.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video conferencing.
Ld. Counsel for respondent bank states that he has filed the reply and copy of the same has been supplied to the Ld. Counsel for appellant.
Ld. Counsel for appellant seeks time to file rejoinder. Let rejoinder be filed by the appellant within two weeks.
List the matter on 06.04.2023 for final arguments.
( CHAIRPERSON )
N
Girija Sharma
Bank of Baroda
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
