The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi, allowed an application to prepone the hearing of a status quo application from 20.07.2022 to 27.05.2022. The matter was listed for hearing on other prayers on the new date.
The request for preponing the hearing date of the status quo application is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 34/2022 Arising out of S.A. No. 60/2019 (DRT-II, Delhi)
Reflective Fabrications Pvt. Ltd. Vs
Bank of India & Ors.
23.05.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, Ld. Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Pallav Saxena, Ld. Counsel for appellant
Mr. Jaspreet Singh, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1
Mr. Hemant Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel for respondents 2 and 3
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
I.A. No.189/2022
This is an application for preponing and hearing of the appellant’s request for status quo with respect to nature, physical attributes, title and possession of the property in question and goods lying therein, to restrain respondents 2 and 3 or any other person from removing any goods from the property in question and to restrain respondents 2 and 3 from creating any third party interest or selling/alienating/transferring/assigning/creating any encumbrance/parting with the possession of the property in question.
Heard. The prayer for preponing the matter, which is otherwise listed on 20.07.2022 , is allowed. List the matter on 27.05.2022 for hearing on other prayers made in the application.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for preponing the hearing of the status quo application is allowed.
Reflective Fabrications Pvt. Ltd.
Bank of India
Ors.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
