Ashima Limited v. Hdfc Bank Limited & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The tribunal noted variance between counsel regarding whether the jurisdictional question was decided by the Debt Recovery Tribunal. The matter was postponed for hearing on 28.11.2022 to address this issue.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 32/2018
Between
M/s. Ashima Ltd … Appellant/s
V/s.
HDFC Bank Ltd & Anr.
…Respondent/s
Mr Gurang Kinkhabwala along with Mr R. J. Ghag, Advocate for Appellant.
Ms Sarrah Khambati, i/b M/s. Wadia Gandhi & Co., Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
Mr Madhur Rai along with Mr Balraj Kulkarni, i/b M/s. PRS Legal, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
-: Order dated: 21/10/2022:-
It is seen that the question of jurisdiction is one of the prime points that need to be considered. The Ld. Counsel appearing on either side are at variance as to whether that question was decided by the D.R.T. or not. Hence, that question shall be heard on 28.11.2022.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Ashima Ltd
- respondent
HDFC Bank Ltd
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court