Paresh Nath Dutta & Ors. v. Uco Bank & Ors.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 293 of 2018)
(Arising out of S.A. 445 of 2016 in DRT-2, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
08.6.2022 Paresh Chandra Dutta & 3 Others … Appellants -Vs-
UCO Bank & 2 Others … Respondents
Mr. Anubhav Singh with Mr. Subhasis Dey, Learned Counsel for Appellants
Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1 and 2/ Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Copy of the supplementary affidavit was provided to the Respondent Bank well in advance. Till date no reply to the supplementary affidavit is filed.
Cost of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) is imposed on the Respondent Bank, with a direction to file reply to the supplementary affidavit within a period of ten days. Costs imposed be deposited in the P.M. Relief Fund.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Paresh Chandra Dutta & 3 Others
- respondent
UCO Bank & 2 Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court