Madda Koteswara rao v. United Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order admitting an appeal arising from a DRT judgment in Visakhapatnam, listing interim applications, and scheduling disposal. The judgment contains no substantive reasoning or final disposition.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 323 of 2022)
(Arising out of S.A. 260 of 2015 in DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
22.07.2022 Madda Koteswara Rao
… Appellant -VsUnion Bank of India … Respondent
None for Appellant
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
For Admission
Appeal is admitted. Regular appeal number be given.
Let copy of the Memo of Appeal along with I.A. 223 of 2022 and I.A. 224 of 2022 be served upon the Respondent and file Affidavit-of-service before the next date of listing.
Objections, if any, against I.A. 223 of 2022 and I.A. 224 of 2022, be filed in the meantime with advance copy to Appellant. Rejoinder, if any, be filed before the next date of listing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Madda Koteswara Rao
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court