Mr v. Sriram Ors. v Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
Counsel for the appellants sought an adjournment to amend the cause title of the respondent bank due to a merger. The matter was listed for a later date to facilitate these steps.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
R.A:29/2021
Mr.V.Sriram & Ors ... Appellants Vs Vijaya Bank ... Respondent
04/05/2022
Learned Counsel Mr. Sidhaarth L.M. representing Mr. P. Parthasarathy for Appellants is present.
No representation for Respondent Bank.
Counsel for Appellants prays for some more time to take steps to amend the cause title of the Respondent, Vijaya Bank on account of merger.
At request of Counsel for Appellants, list the case on 18.05.2022, for taking steps.
Sd./Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr. V. Sriram & Ors
- respondent
Vijaya Bank
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court