Appeal adjourned to allow respondent to place copy of Section 13(2) notice on record and decide waiver of predeposit application.
Matter adjourned to 22.09.2022 for hearing on application for waiver of predeposit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.284/2019 Arising out of S.A.No.54/2019 (DRT-II, Chandigarh)
Sh.Santosh Kumar & Anr. Vs
ICICI Bank Ltd. & Anr.
20.09.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Nimish Chib, Ld. Counsel for appellant.
Mr. Satish Kumar, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 bank.
Mr. Sandeep Jha, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.2.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Ld. Counsel for appellant states that notice under Section 13(2) of SARFAESI Act was never served upon him and therefore he could not file copy thereof. However, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 bank submits that he will place on record the copy of the demand notice issued under Section 13(2) to the appellant. Let him do so before the next date.
At request of the Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1, the matter is adjourned to 22.09.2022 for hearing on the application (I.A. No.620/1019) for waiver of predeposit.
(CHAIRPERSON)
N
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh Kumar & Anr.
ICICI Bank Ltd. & Anr.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
