Doha Bank Qsc v. M/S Mysore Timber Mart & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Registrar's order under the doctrine of charms dismissing remedy for default due to failure by appellant to seek time or representation
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 279/2005
Between
Doha Bank QSC … Appellant/s V/s. M/s Mysore Timber Mart & Ors. …Respondent/s
There is no representation for the Appellant or the Respondent. On 31.10.2022 an officer representing the Appellant sought time to withdraw the appeal. Since there is no representation, I assume that the Appellant is no longer keen on proceeding with the appeal.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.
All Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-25
1
Doha Bank QSC
Mysore Timber Mart & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court