The tribunal granted permission to the appellant to withdraw the appeal, finding it infructuous, and disposed of the matter as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the appeal; appeal disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Appeal No. 27/2022
Between Bhairavnath Sugar Works Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. M/s. Twentyone Sugars Ltd. …Respondent/s
Ms. Pariyal G. Sarda, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated : 27/04/2022 :-
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of Praecipe dated 20.04.2022 filed by Appellant for seeking urgent relief.
Learned counsel appearing for Appellant submits that the Appeal has become infructuous in view of the order dated 26.02.2022 of the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, and hence seeks permission to withdraw the Appeal.
Permission is granted to withdraw the Appeal.
Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
All other Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
dpj/mks-12
Bhairavnath Sugar Works Ltd.
M/s. Twentyone Sugars Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
