Bank Of Baroda v. Hema Construction
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal no.27/2022 allowed adjournment for filing reply and rejoinder documents before listing for final arguments. Proceeding involves Bank of Baroda vs M/s Hema Construction.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.27/2022 In Arising out of S.A.No.87/2017(DRT, Jaipur)
Bank of Baroda Vs M/s Hema Construction & Others
21.09.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Ms. Harshita Gupta, Ld. Counsel for appellant bank.
Mr. Swetab Kumar, Ld. Counsel for respondents.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
At request of the Ld. Counsels for parties, reply be filed within four weeks and rejoinder, if any, within two weeks thereafter.
List this matter for 10.01.2023 for final arguments.
(CHAIRPERSON)
N
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Baroda
- respondent
M/s Hema Construction & Others
Coram
Brijesh Sethi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court