Appeal against a DRT order dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear, make predeposit, or address waiver of pre-deposit application.
None; appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 265/2019 Arising out of O.A. No. 459/2015 (DRT-III, Delhi)
M/s RR Enterprises Vs Canara Bank
25.05.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Aamir Shaikh, Ld. counsel for the Respondent Bank.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
No one has appeared on behalf of the appellant since 29.06.2020. Predeposit has also not been made till date. Even no arguments have been addressed on waiver of pre-deposit application.
The present appeal is, therefore, dismissed for non prosecution.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-ak
M/s RR Enterprises
Canara Bank
Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
