Indian Bank v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Thin listing order regarding time for arguments in Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal proceedings; no substantive decision rendered.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
R.A:26/2021
Indian Bank ... Appellant
Vs Union Bank Of India & Ors ... Respondents
30/05/2022
Representing counsel for Ld. Counsel Shri S. Pandurangan for appellant bank and representing counsel Shri S. Doddamani for Ld. Counsel Shir Nagendrakumar K for R5 are present.
Proof of service filed. R1 & R5 served. Notice sent to R2 and R4 returned with postal endorsement ‘refused’. Notice sent to R3 returned with endorsement ‘deceased”. Service deemed sufficient for R2 & R4.
Advocate Shri A. Periasamy filed vakalath for R1. Ld. Counsel for R5 filed written arguments and sought time for arguments.
At request of Ld. Counsel for R5, list the matter on 7.7.2022 for arguments. Steps against deceased R3 by then.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Indian Bank
- respondent
Union Bank Of India
Coram
Sd/Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
21 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court