In Appeal No. 254/2013, the Appellant sought steps to regularize service of notice on Respondents 2 to 6. The court adjourned the matter for 21.09.2022 to allow the Appellant to cure procedural defects in the service application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Appeal No. 254/2013
Between
Indian Bank … Appellant/s V/s.
Chandrakala Mukundrao Kohale & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Naval Tanwar, i/b M/s. VNA Legal, Advocate for Appellants.
-: Order dated: 11/08/2022:-
Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 have not yet been served. The learned counsel for the Appellant submitted that an application for service by substituted service has been filed. There are some defects pointed out by the Registry which need to be cured. The defect shall be cured expeditiously.
Post on 21.09.2022 for steps.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-1
1
Indian Bank
Chandrakala Mukundrao Kohale
Respondents 2 to 6
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
