In Appeal No. 252/2013, the DRAT noted the absence of the appellant's representation. The court directed the appellant to file a Vakalatnama and take steps for necessary substitution due to a merger with Indian Bank, and posted the matter.
Direction to file Vakalatnama and effect substitution of parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 252/2013
Between
Allahabad Bank … Appellant/s V/s. Pushpak Bullion Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s -: Order dated : 14/06/2022 :-
There is no representation for the Appellant Bank even though on 09.05.2022 it was submitted by the counsel for the Bank that Vakalatnama is intended to be filed and since the Appellant has merged with Indian Bank the steps also need to be taken for substitution.
Appellant is directed to take necessary steps as above, positively.
Post on 21.07.2022 for steps.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-13
1
Allahabad Bank
Pushpak Bullion Pvt. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
