The Appeals Bench, noting a short payment of Rs.30,000/- in court fees by the appellant bank, directed notice to respondents after the deficit was made good.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.236/2022 Arising out of O.A.No.260/2019 (DRT-II, Delhi)
Canara Bank Vs
Mr. Manish Kumar Sharma & Ors.
20.12.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Ms. Aditi Sharma, Ld. counsel for appellant bank
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Registry reports that the court fee paid by the appellant is short by Rs.30,000/-
Subject to appellant making good the deficit court fee, let notice be issued to respondents by all permissible modes for 09.05.2023.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Canara Bank
Mr. Manish Kumar Sharma & Ors.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
