This order dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to deposit the court fee within the time granted by a previous order dated 29.09.2021.
The appeal is treated as dismissed for non-deposit of court fee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 233/2016 Date: 19.01.2022
Mrs. Satya Singh & Anr. Vs. State Bank of India
The Hon’ble Court vide order dated 29.09.2021 had granted the opportunity to deposit the deficit court fee on or before the next date, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed. The time granted by the Hon’ble Court to comply with the order has expired.
As per the office report, the appellant has not deposited the court fee in compliance of the order dated 29.09.2021.
In view of the order dated 29.09.2021 of the Hon’ble Tribunal, the Appeal is treated to have been dismissed.
A copy of this order along with order dated 29.09.2021 be sent to the parties as well as the DRT concerned and be also uploaded on the e-DRT portal.
Registrar
AK
Mrs. Satya Singh & Anr.
State Bank of India
Registrar
AK
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
