M Sarojana v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
In an interim order, the tribunal granted Respondent Bank four weeks to file an opposition to the appeal and listed the matter for future hearing. No merits were decided.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 230 of 2018) (Arising out of S.A. 485 of 2013 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
01.08.2022 M. Sarojana … Appellant -vsState Bank of India & & Another … Respondents
None for Appellant
Mr. P.K. Ray, Learned Counsel for the Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for Respondent prays for and is granted, 4 weeks time to file opposition with advance copy to the Appellant. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter.
List the matter on 17th January, 2023 for hearing of the appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 30th September, 2022 15/ac
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M. Sarojana
- respondent
State Bank of India
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court