The appellate tribunal noted an appeal challenging a pre-deposit order. The chairperson dismissed the appellant's submission regarding the necessity of a third-party pre-deposit and directed the issue notice for a decision on that matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.229/2022 Arising out of S.A. No.341/2022 (DRT-III
Neeraj Vs. HDFC Bank Ltd. & Ors.
16.12.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Gurvinder Singh, Ld. counsel for appellant
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant is third party and, therefore, not required to make any pre-deposit.
Issue notice of the appeal to the respondents by all permissible modes for 20.12.2022, however this will be subject to finding on the fact whether predeposit is required to be made or not.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Neeraj
HDFC Bank Ltd.
Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
