Canara Bank v. Susanta Sarkar
Case brief
What is this about?
This departmental note records service of summons on the respondent and lists the date for placement before the Chairperson. No decision on merits or placement before the Chairperson was taken within this text.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Dy. no.65/2020 Date:22/02/2022
Canara Bank ……….Appellant
Vs.
Susanta Sarkar ……….Respondents
Ld. Advocate, Ms. Aditi Roy is present for appellant and submits memo of appearance. Affidavit of service of summons is filed on18.01.2021. Tracking reports are showing that summons has been served in two different addresses of sole respondent. One of the track reports is showing remark as “not delivered refused”. It may be treated as good service.
None appears for respondent.
Let the matter be placed before Hon’ble Chairperson on 06.06.2022.
Sd/-
REGISTRAR
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Canara Bank
- respondent
Susanta Sarkar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court