Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the ground, on which the impugned order was passed by the Tribunal below, is that with regard to the lease property, no objection certificate was taken from the MPSIDB, whereas there was ‘no objection certificate’ issued by the MPSIDB, which was filed before the Tribunal below stating that lease property can be mortgaged. The learned counsel has drawn attention of this Tribunal towards page No. 159, as Annexures-17 to the paper book, which is an order dated 22.11.2018 of the Tribunal below. Para 7 of the said order has been referred to show that the certificate/NOC dated 13.08.2007 was taken from the authority concerned, but the same has not been taken into consideration by the Tribunal below. It is, therefore, contended that the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.