Order granting an adjournment of a banking dispute appeal due to the appellant's counsel's inability to appear owing to a family ailment and listing the matter for a future date.
Case listed for hearing on 31.08.2022; adjournment granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 08/2022 Date: 19.05.2022
Shri Rajendra Soni & Ors. Vs. Bank of Baroda & Anr.
Present: Shri Rajneesh Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the appellants, None for the respondents,
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the present matter is to be argued by Shri Satish Agrawal, who has to come from Jabalpur, but he could not come today on account of ailment of his father, therefore, he prays for adjournment.
List this case on 31.08.2022 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Shri Rajendra Soni & Ors.
Bank of Baroda & Anr.
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
