The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata allowed the appellant's request to withdraw Appeal No. 03 of 2022 arising out of S.A. 313 of 2020 in the DRT, Visakhapatnam. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, and any interim order was vacated.
Appeal No. 03 of 2022 dismissed as withdrawn; interim order vacated; file consigned to record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 03 of 2022)
(Arising out of S.A. 313 of 2020 in DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
04.07.2022 Bank of Baroda … Appellant -VsSmt. Ch. Sai Naga Vasudha … Respondent Mr. Nemani Srinivas with Mr. Rohit Bhattacharjee, Learned Counsel for Appellant
None for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel Mr. Nemani Srinivas along with Mr. Rohit Bhattacharjee submits that they want to withdraw the appeal.
In view of the above submission, the appeal, being Appeal No. 03 of 2022, is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated. File be consigned to record room.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 04th July, 2022 04/ac
Bank of Baroda
Smt. Ch. Sai Naga Vasudha
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
