The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai directed the non-filing respondent to submit a reply positively within four weeks from the status notice and posted the appeal for hearing on 27.01.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 07/2021
Between M/s. Newton Engineering & Chemicals Ltd. & … Appellant/s Ors. V/s.
Bank of Baroda & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr Manmohan Rao, Advocate for Appellant
Ms Meenu P, i/b Ms Rathina Maravarman, Advocate for Respondent (Bank of Baroda).
-: Order dated 27/10/2022:-
The Respondent has not filed any reply on the Appeal. Reply, if any, shall be positively filed within four weeks. Post on 27.01.2023 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-26
1
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal requires adjudication when the respondent has not filed a reply.
Whether the appellant needs time to file a reply to the notice of appeal.
What is the appropriate next step regarding the hearing of the appeal.
M/s. Newton Engineering & Chemicals Ltd.
Bank of Baroda
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
