The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, directed the appellant to serve notice on the unserved 2nd respondent within three weeks and posted the matter for further steps on 13.10.2022.
Directive to serve notice on 2nd respondent within three weeks. Postponed to 13.10.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 3/2020
Between Mehsana Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. Niteshkumar K. Mehta & Anr. … Respondent/s Ms. Sonali Jain, Advocate for Appellants.
Mr. Prashant Pandit along with Mr. Jay Pandit, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
-: Order dated: 18/07/2022:-
The 2nd Respondent has not been served despite specific direction to take steps for service. Appellant is, therefore, directed to take steps to serve notice on 2nd Respondent within three weeks.
Post on 13.10.2022 for steps/service.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-10
1
1 issue framed by the court
How to proceed when the 2nd respondent in a debt recovery appeal has not been served despite directions for service?
Mehsana Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd.
Niteshkumar K. Mehta
2nd Respondent
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
