The Tribunal granted adjournment to the appellant due to counsel absence and fixed a date for waiver proceedings. Other procedural directions regarding warranty of waiver and rejoinder were issued.
Case listed on 24.02.2023 for waiver; waiver application to be filed by next date; rejoinder to be filed by next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 05/2020 Date: 24.11.2022
M/s Goldmohar Gramodyog Sansthan Vs. R.O. DRT, Allahabad and Ors.
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sanjay Kumar Gupta, counsel for the appellant, Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent no. 2-Bank, None for the respondent no. 3,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the arguing counsel Shri S. K. Gupta is out of station, therefore, he is unable to attend this Tribunal today and he prays for adjournment.
The office report dated 23.11.2022 shows that no waiver application has been filed. Let the same be filed by the next date. Reply has already been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 2 & 3, to which no rejoinder has been filed. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List this case on 24.02.2023 for waiver.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
M/s Goldmohar Gramodyog Sansthan
R.O. DRT, Allahabad
R. D. Khare
Anupam
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
