The DrAT Delhi considered an appeal where the appellant made a 25% predeposit. On counsel's request for a short adjournment to file a rejoinder, the matter was adjourned. No substantive decision was recorded.
Adjournment granted to 29.08.2022 for filing rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 20/2022 Arising out of S.A. No. 33/2016 (DRT, Jaipur)
Dwarka Nath Sharma Vs HDFC Bank Ltd.
25.08.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Alakh Alok Srivastava, Ld. counsel for appellant
Mr. Anuj Bhandari, Ld. counsel for respondent bank
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant has made a predeposit of 25%.
He prays for a short adjournment for filing rejoinder. At his request, adjourned to 29.08.2022. Rejoinder, if any, may be filed by tomorrow, i.e. 26.08.2022.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Dwarka Nath Sharma
HDFC Bank Ltd.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
22 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
