The appeals hearing was adjourned to 15.02.2023 because the Appellant's counsel agreed to furnish a fresh copy of a document cited as incomplete by the Respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 197/2011
Between Pralhad S/o Sitaram Sundarkar … Appellant/s V/s. Bank of Maharashtra & Anr …Respondent/s
Bank of Maharashtra & Anr Mr Puneet Gogad, Advocate for Appellant. Mr M. N. Phadke, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
The Learned Counsel for the first Respondent has filed pursis stating that the document produced by the Appellant is not complete and therefore, brought to the attention of the counsel appearing for the Appellant.
The Ld. Counsel for the Appellant agrees to furnish a fresh copy of the same and hence, the hearing of the Appeal is adjourned to 15.02.2023.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-21
1
Pralhad S/o Sitaram Sundarkar
Bank of Maharashtra & Anr
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
