M/s Small Industries Development Bank of India v. Geetha Ravishankar & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
During call work, the advocate for respondents sought an adjournment due to the unavailability of senior counsel, resulting in a delay in deciding the matter.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
R.A(S.A):194/2017
M/S Small Industries Development Bank Of India V/S Geetha Ravishankar & Ors
12/10/2022
During call work, advocate Shri Sidhaarth L.N. for R1 & R2 reported ready, apart from Ld. Counsels for appellant and R3 & R4.
When matter was called after call work, Advocate for R1 & R2 sought pass over twice and when matter was again called at 11.45 AM, he represented that senior counsel is not able to return as he is held up before Hon’ble High Court of Madras and sought for adjournment.
Therefore, matter is adjourned to 4.11.2022 for continuation of arguments on costs of Rs.5000/- to be paid by R1 & R2 to appellant and R3 & R4 at Rs.2500/- each.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Small Industries Development Bank Of India
- respondent
Geetha Ravishankar
- respondent
Ors
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court