The DRAT allowed an interim application to substitute Corporation Bank with Union Bank of India, the bank into which the appellant had merged. No objection was raised by respondents.
Substitution of Corporation Bank with Union Bank of India as appellant allowed; consequential amendments directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 296/2022
(Substitution of Appellant Bank) In Appeal No. 188/2015
Between
Corporation Bank … Appellant/s V/s. Smt. Jayashreeben Damodar Killarkar & Ors. … Respondent/s Ms Meena P., i/b Ms Rathina Maravarman, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated: 22/07/2022:-
I.A. No. 296/2022 is an application filed by the Appellant to substitute the Appellant, Corporation Bank, with Union Bank of India, into which the Appellant Bank has merged. Notice has been served. There is no objection forthcoming, hence the application is allowed and the consequential amendments shall be carried out within two weeks and an amended copy of the Appeal memo shall be served on the Respondents.
Post on 26.10.2022 for reporting compliance/hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-6
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application to substitute the appellant corporation with its merged entity Union Bank of India should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Corporation Bank
Smt. Jayashreeben Damodar Killarkar & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
