Default order where the appellant and respondent were absent in DRTA Kolkata, leading to dismissal of the dairy application arising from a DRT case in Guwahati.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Dairy No. 351 of 2019)
(Arising out of SA. 53 of 2019 in DRT, Guwahati)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
07.07.2022 Pabitra Pran Saikia … Appellant -VsUnion Bank of India … Respondent None for the Appellant.
None for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the revised list.
No one is present. Application for waiver as well as exemption of court fees is dismissed in default.
Accordingly Dairy No.351 of 2019 is dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand closed.
Copy of this order be uploaded to the website.
File be consigned to Record room.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 7th July, 2022 10/Rc
Pabitra Pran Saikia
Union Bank of India
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
