Uco Bank v. Vidyadhar Saini
Case brief
What is this about?
A debt recovery appeal listed for hearing with the respondent allowed time to file a reply. Respondents 2-5 appeared ex-parte due to non-appearance.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No.18/2022
Arising out of O.A.No.340/2020 (DRT, Jaipur)
UCO Bank
Vs
Vidhyadhar Sainai
28.07.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. I.S.Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for the appellant.
Mr. Deepak Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for Respondent no. 1.
None for the respondent no. 2-5.
This matter has been taken by me through Video Conferencing.
None has appeared on behalf of respondent no. 2-5 despite service. They
are, therefore, proceeded ex-parte.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
UCO Bank
- respondent
Vidhyadhar Sainai
Coram
Brijesh Sethi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court