Canara Bank v. D.Ramanna Naik & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal adjourned the matter to provide the respondent with time to file written arguments.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
R.A:179/2019
Canara Bank ... Appellant Vs
D. Ramanna Naik & Ors ... Respondents
25/05/2022
Ld. Counsel Shri Raghunathan of M/s T.S. Gopalan & Co for appellant bank and representing counsel for Ld. Counsel Shri A.V. Somasundaram for R1 are present.
Written argument of R1 filed today. Ld. Counsel for R1 sought time for arguments.
At request of Ld. Counsel for R1, list the matter on 24.6.2022 for arguments. Written arguments of appellant by then.
Sd./Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Canara Bank
- respondent
D. Ramanna Naik & Ors
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court