The tribunal listed the matter for filing written arguments by Counsel for the 3rd Respondent and for arguments. No representation was filed by the appellant.
This order is a procedural listing directing the filing of written arguments by the 3rd Respondent and scheduling arguments for a later date. No substantive decision was rendered in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
R.A:177/2018
M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd
... Appellant
Vs
Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Co Ltd & ors ... Respondent
28/03 /2022
No representation for the appellant bank. Representing counsel Shri Subramanian for Ld. Counsel Shri S. Sethuraman for R3 present.
At request of Ld. Counsel for R3, list the matter on 11.5.2022 for filing written arguments of R3 and for arguments.
Sd./Chairperson
M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd
Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Co Ltd
rdherent 3rd Respondent
Chairperson
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
