The Tribunal condoned a 428-day delay in representing an appeal after finding that objections raised against it had been complied with.
Condono of delay of 428 days in representing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 25/2018 In A.IR:390/2016
Kavita Prahaladaka V/S A. O., State Bank Of India & Ors
07/11/2022
Heard both sides.
This application is filed to condone delay of 428 days in representing the appeal that was returned for compliance of certain office objections. Advocate for appellant submitted all those objections are complied with.
Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit and without prejudice to the rights of opposite party, delay of 428 days in representing the appeal is condoned.
Application is ordered accordingly.
Sd/Chairperson
Kavita Prahaladaka
A. O., State Bank Of India
Chairperson
As recorded by the court registry
28 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
