B Britto v. State Bank Of India
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
R.A(S.A):165/2017
B.Britto
... Appellant
Vs
SBI
... Respondent
11/3/2022
Learned Counsel Mr. P. Murugan representing Mr. V. Ravi for Appellant and Mr. M. Karthik representing Mr. K.Mohandas for Respondent Bank are present.
Counsel for the Appellant prays for time to bring the assignee viz., ARCIL, on record.
List the case on 25.04.2022.
In the meantime, the Appellant to file Written Arguments.
Sd./Chairperson
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant was permitted time to bring the assignee on record.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
B. Britto
- respondent
SBI
Coram
Unspecified
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court